RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Pair Of Brazilian Companies Hit With RDNH Trying To Snag Trix.com

Case Number: D2024-0778

Represented by: Wilson Silveira e Associados

Trix may be known as a children’s cereal in the United States, but a lone panelist of the World Intellectual Property Organization was not indulging child’s-play when he handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against a pair of Brazilian companies that tried to grap trix.com with a UDRP filing. Panelist Assen Alexiev […]

Read More...

UDRP Strikes Sour Note, Earns Music Company RDNH Ruling

Case Number: D2023-5355

Represented by: Riker Danzig LLP

A New Jersey-based music school with a global reach has been found guilty of abusing the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domain musictogetherofmarin.com. Music Together LLC was found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization. The sole member of the panel, David H. Bernstein, […]

Read More...

American Fintech Company Guilty Of RDNH Trying To Swipe Euronet.com

Case Number: D2024-0293

Represented by: Eversheds Sutherland

Euronet Worldwide, Inc., a U.S.-based online payments processor, has been found guilty of attempting to hijack the domain euronet.com from its Dutch owner, Euronet Internet, of the Netherlands. A sole panelist at the World Intellectual Property Organization, Adam Taylor, handed up the ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on March 26, 2024.

Read More...

Australian Company Slapped With RDNH Trying To Hijack WholesaleSuite.com

Case Number: NAF 208456

Represented by: Allen, Dyer, Doppelt and Gilchrist, P.A.

Rymera Web Co Pty Ltd, and Australian company that develops online software plugins for WooCommerce websites, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by a single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum. The company had filed a UDRP for the domain wholesalesuite.com, which is being used by a British company that also sells […]

Read More...

Teen Cosmetics Company Cornered With RDNH Attempting To Steal FreshKidz.com

Case Number: NAF 2078165

Represented by: Timothy Frailly

A company that makes deodorants and cosmetics for teens and children, Fresh Brandz LLC, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its use of the UDRP process to acquire the domain, freshkidz.com, from its current owner. A three-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling on RDNH […]

Read More...
1 7 8 9 10 11 69

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!