RDNH Cases

Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!

Back to Top

Aero Club of New Delhi, India Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1656

Represented by: Lall & Sethi Advocates, India

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1656 Aero Club of New Delhi, India, represented by Lall & Sethi Advocates, India was found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) by a one person UDRP WIPO panel on the generic domain name Woodland.com Aero Club operates under the domain name woodlandworldwide.com which they registered in 2002 and tried to […]

Read More...

Timbermate Products Pty Ltd Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1603

Represented by: K & L Gates LLP, Australia

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1603 Timbermate Products Pty Ltd of Nunawading, Victoria, Australia, represented by K & L Gates LLP, Australia has just been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain name Timbermate.com The one member panel of Tony Willoughby gives an excellent recap of UDRP decisions where RDNH was found […]

Read More...

Cairns Airport Pty Ltd of Queensland, Australia, Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: DAU2013-0023

Represented by: McCullough Robertson Lawyers, Australia

WIPO Domain Name Decision: DAU2013-0023 Cairns Airport Pty Ltd of Cairns, Queensland, Australia, represented by McCullough Robertson Lawyers, Australia has been found GUILTY of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on two domain names owned by two different owners; cairnsairportparking.com.au (first domain name) and airportparkingcairns.net.au (second domain name) “Paragraph 15(e) of the Rules provides that, if “after […]

Read More...

Bergzeit GmbH Owner Of Bergzeit.de: Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1346

Represented by: lawyers Riegger , Ludwigsburg, Germany

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1346 Bergzeit GmbH of Wooden Churches , Germany , represented by lawyers Riegger , Ludwigsburg, Germany  has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the domain name Bergzeit.com by a one member WIPO panel. Bergzeit translates into Mountain Time in German. The UDRP decision was published in German. The […]

Read More...

Core Diagnostics of Gurgaon India, Guilty Of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Case Number: D2013-1238

Represented by: In-house council

WIPO Domain Name Decision: D2013-1238 Core Diagnostics of Gurgaon, India has just been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking (RDNH) on the UDRP it filed on the domain name corediagnostics.com by a one member WIPO panel. Core Diangostics was represented by in-house council. Here are the relevant facts and findings by the one member […]

Read More...
1 56 57 58 59 60 68

My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.

Thou Shalt Not Steal! Stop trying to steal and start doing Business! Feel free to repost Far and Wide!

Rick Schwartz

Rick Schwartz

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!