Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: D2022-1966
Represented by: LS Avocats
A French stock company, founded under the name Enodo in 2021, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for attempting to steal the domain enodo.com from its original registrant, who acquired the domain in 2000. In a four-page ruling, shorter than most UDRP decisions, a single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-0945
Represented by: Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Reza IP Holdings LLC, the United States holding company in the family of French jewelry designer Alexandre Reza, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, with a dissenting opinion, by a three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization. The majority of the panel found Reza IP Holdings attempted to use the UDRP […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-1456
Represented by: Churovich Law, LLC
A small California company that manufactures industrial equipment for customers in the aluminum and forging industry, among others, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking after trying to take the domain JTT.com from its original registrant using the UDRP process. Thorpe Technologies, which claims to be well known by JTT moniker, and recently […]
Read More...Case Number: D2022-0880
Represented by: AnantLaw India
An Indian pharmaceutical company has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for attempting to use the UDRP process to transfer the domain zydus.com from its owner, claiming trademark rights that predated the domain name registration in 2004. However, a three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found the company, Zydus Lifesciences Ltd., […]
Read More...Case Number: CAC-UDRP-104446
Represented by: Thomsen Trampedach GmbH
A UK-based price comparison company, uSwitch Limited, which operates on the domains uswitch.co.uk and uswitch.com, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking for trying to grab the domain youswitch.com, in a case of bad corporate blood dating to at least 2007. uSwitch claimed a trademark in the mark “USWITCH”, which dates to 2000, […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
