Below is our current list of those inducted into the Hall of Shame or found guilty of trying to Reverse Hijack a Domain Name in which they had no legal rights. In other words they tried to bully the rightful owners into relinquishing their property and forcing these innocent parties to spend thousands to defend what they already own. Since there is no Legal Penalty, we are determined to Shame these companies along with their attorneys that represent them. What can you do? Tweet, Like, Circulate! Help me, Help you!
Case Number: D2024-4861
Represented by: Boehmert & Boehmert
Solar Hero, GmbH, of Germany, has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with its use of the UDRP process to impel a transfer of the domain hive-pt.com. The company, via counsel, argued its trademark, for the mark “tradinghive” gave it rights to the domain, because it incorporated the word “hive”. The […]
Read More...Case Number: CAC-UDRP-107033
Represented by: self
A German doctor in the medical cannabis field has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with his use of the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domain canngo.express. The physician filing the complaint, Dr. Can Ansay, represented himself. He argued the domain, which was registered in March of 2024, […]
Read More...Case Number: D2024-3556
Represented by: De Penning & De Penning
An established India-based textile manufacturer has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with their attempt to force the transfer of the domain nallifinancialservices.com via the UDRP process. The company, the Chennai-based Nalli Chinnasami Chetty, had sought, by and through counsel, to take the domain from a U.S.-based entrepreneur, whose surname is […]
Read More...Case Number: NAF 2123653
Represented by: Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC
A rural Arkansas bank has been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking by the National Arbitration Forum for attempting to use the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domains armorbank.com and armorbank.org. Armor Bank, which has its main office in Forrest City, Arkansas, near the eastern border with Tennessee, had sought the […]
Read More...Case Number: D2024-4344
Represented by: Legal In Motion
A French holdings company and its subsidiary have been found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking in connection with their effort to use the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domain amexio.com, initially registered in 2011. In the complaint, Michelios 3 and its subsidiary, AmeXio, tried to claim the domain was registered in […]
Read More...My hope is this is the last RDNH case I will ever have to write about and circulate. The reality is I will write every company and their representation every single time there is a case of RDNH. To fight back we had to create HallofShame.com to get the message across to Main Street and Main Stream. Now maybe some value based companies will think twice before flirting with this tactic and come to the bargaining table in good faith instead of being labeled forever on Hall of Shame. The net is written in ink! And now a monument has been built at a common crossroads that many more folks will see. Just like being in Times Square.
