The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!
Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!
Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?
All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
Client: Slade Shipping, Inc. DBA Slade Global ( Texas )
Result: Slade Shipping, Inc. DBA Slade Global found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Texas-based lawyer Jacob Guidry represented Slade Shipping, Inc. DBA Slade Global at the National Arbitration Forum, as the company attempted to use the UDRP process to impel a transfer of the domain sladeglobal.com. A single-member panel at the NAF handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Slade Shipping, Inc. on August 19, […]
Read More...Client: MOVI, LLC ( Utah, United States )
Result: MOVI, LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Lyndon Cook, Jr. is a Utah-based attorney who represented MOVI, LLC before the National Arbitration Forum in the company’s bid to transfer the domain movi.com using a UDRP filing. A three-member panel at the NAF handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against MOVI, LLC on August 18, 2025.
Read More...Client: Munchies LLC ( North Carolina )
Result: Munchies LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Wali U. Raja, from the North Carolina law firm of Jarrals Law, represented Munchies LLC in its failed UDRP action to reverse hijack a 27-year old domain name, munchies.com. A one-person panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Munchies LLC on August 13, 2025.
Read More...Client: Eetho Brands, Inc. ( United States )
Result: Eetho Brands, Inc. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Sideman & Bancroft LLP represented Eetho Brands, Inc., a maker of energy drinks, in its effort to use the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain dosedaily.com, using word mark registrations from the supplemental U.S. register to claim an accrual of trademark rights. A sole panelist of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed […]
Read More...Client: Sierra Remote Observatories, LLC ( California, United States )
Result: Sierra Remote Observatories, LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Sierra IP Law, PC represented the California-based telescope leasing company Sierra Remote Observatories, LLC, in its failed UDRP complaint to gain control of the domain sro.com. A single-person panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found Sierra Remote Observatories guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking, handing up the ruling on August 9, 2025.
Read More...