Attorneys & Firms

The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!

Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!

Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?

All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Back to Top

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

Client: Daniel Rosen, Inc. d/b/a Credit Repair Cloud ( Los Angeles, California, United States )

Result: Daniel Rosen, Inc. d/b/a Credit Repair Cloud found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Attorney Andrew Skale of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C., located in California, represented Daniel Rosen, Inc., doing business as Credit Repair Cloud, in the company’s attempt to take the domain credithero.com from its owner. The RDNH was handed up on October 12, 2020. Firm added October 13, 2020.

Read More...

SoCal IP Law Group LLP

SoCal IP Law Group LLP

Client: Green Globe Ltd. ( Los Angeles, California, USA and United Kingdom )

Result: Green Globe Ltd. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

The Los Angeles law firm, SoCal IP Law Group LLP, represented the UK-based company, Green Globe Ltd., in its effort to gain control of the domain name greenglobe.com. The case was filed at the World Intellectual Property Organization, and the RDNH ruling was handed up September 24, 2020. Firm added October 12, 2020.

Read More...

Andrea Colombo

Client: Elcoman, Srl, Italy ( Italy )

Result: Elcoman, Srl, Italy found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Andrea Colombo was the attorney of record in case D2020-1628, in which the Italian company, Elcoman Srl, Italy, tried to take the domain, kobra.com, from Marc Ellis, a resident of the United Kingdom. Name added October 3, 2020.

Read More...

NLO Shieldmark B.V.

NLO Shieldmark B.V.

Client: DSPA, B.V. ( Nijmegen, Netherlands )

Result: DSPA, B.V. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

The Netherlands-based intellectual property firm of NLO Shieldmark B.V. represented the company DSPA B.V., a manufacturer of fire-suppression aerosol systems, in their attempt to acquire the domain dspa.com from Reserved Media, LLC. There are about 90 patent and trademark attorneys working at the firm, according to their website, www.nlo.eu. The RDNH was ruled against their […]

Read More...

Office Freylinger S.A.

Office Freylinger S.A.

Client: AIRY GreenTech GmbH ( Hamburg, Germany )

Result: AIRY GreenTech GmbH found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Office Freylinger S.A. represented the German firm of AIRY GreenTech GmbH in its effort to grab the domain airy.com from Airy Nest of Indonesia. While protracted filings made for a lengthy written ruling, the panel at the World Intellectual Property Organization found for the respondent. The complainant was scolded for its failure to do the most […]

Read More...
1 29 30 31 32 33 46

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!