The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!
Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!
Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?
All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
Client: Enodo France ( Paris, France )
Result: Enodo France found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
LS Avocats, of Paris, France, represented Enodo France in its effort to take the domain enodo.com from its owner. Enodo was founded in 2021, and the domain was originally registered in 2000. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found Enodo guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on July 8, 2022.
Read More...Client: Reza IP Holdings LLC ( New Castle, Delaware, United States )
Result: Reza IP Holdings LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A., of Luxembourg, represented Reza IP Holdings, LLC in its effort to grab the domain reza.com from its owner. A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on June 28, 2022.
Read More...Client: Thorpe Technologies, Inc. ( San Dimas, California, United States )
Result: Thorpe Technologies, Inc. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Churovich Law, LLC represented Thorpe Technologies, Inc., of San Dimas, California, in its efforts to use the UDRP process to transfer the domain JTT.com. A single-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found Thorpe Technologies guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on June 26, 2022.
Read More...Client: Zydus Lifesciences Ltd. ( Ahmedabad, India )
Result: Zydus Lifesciences Ltd. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
AnantLaw Indian, of New Delhi, represented Zydus Lifesciences, formerly known as Cadila Healthcare, in the company’s effort to take the domain zydus.com via the UDRP process. A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization found Zydus guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on June 24, 2022.
Read More...Client: uSwitch Limited ( London, England, United Kingdom )
Result: uSwitch Limited found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Thomsen Trampedach GmbH represented uSwitch Limited, of London, England, United Kingdom, in its effort to take the domain youswitch.com from its owner, a UK-based telecom company. A single-member panel of the Czech Arbitration Court found uSwitch guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking on May 31, 2022.
Read More...