Attorneys & Firms

The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!

Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!

Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?

All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

Back to Top

Boehmert & Boehmert

Boehmert & Boehmert

Client: Solar Hero GmbH ( Germany )

Result: Solar Hero GmbH found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

The German law firm of Boehmert & Boehmert represented the company Solar Hero GmbH in its attempt to use the UDRP arbitration process to force a transfer of the domain hive-pt.com. The firm argued the use of the domain infringed on a trademark for the mark “tradinghive”. A sole panelist, ruling on the matter for […]

Read More...

De Penning & De Penning

De Penning & De Penning

Client: Nalli Chinnasami Chetty ( Chennai, India )

Result: Nalli Chinnasami Chetty found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

De Penning & De Penning represented the Chennai, India-based textile manufacturer Nalli Chinnasami Chetty in their attempt to use the UDRP process to force the transfer of the domain nallifinancialservices.com. A sole panelist for the World Intellectual Property Organization, Steven A. Maier, handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Nalli Chinasami Chetty […]

Read More...

Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC

Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC

Client: Armor Bank ( Forrest City, Arkansas, United States )

Result: Armor Bank found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Attorney Mark R. Holland, from the Arkansas-based law firm of Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC, represented the Forrest City, Arkansas-based Armor Bank in its UDRP filing to force the transfer of the domains armorbank.com and armorbank.org. A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking […]

Read More...

Legal In Motion, France

Legal In Motion (LEGALiM)

Client: Michelios 3 and AmeXio ( Neuilli-sur-Siene, France )

Result: Michelios 3 and AmeXio found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

The French law firm Legal In Motion represented the firm Michelios 3 and its subsidiary, AmeXio, in their UDRP filing aimed at forcing the transfer of the 13-year old domain, amexio.com, from its Canadian owners. A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against the […]

Read More...

Michael J. Feigin, Feigin and Fridman

Feigin and Fridman

Client: My Healthy Home, LLC ( Readington Township, New Jersey, United States )

Result: My Healthy Home, LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking

Attorney Michael J. Feigin, of the New Jersey-based firm of Feigin and Fridman, represented My Healthy Home, LLC in its attempt to use the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain healthyhomeexperts.net. A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against My Healthy Home, […]

Read More...
1 2 3 47

Join the fight... Share Hall of Shame Far and Wide!!!