The job of the attorney is not to be part of a hijacking and actually Aid and Abet. It's the job of the attorney to educate their client or fire their client. Explain the self inflicted damage that can be done to them, their company, their brand, you as an attorney and the firm you work for. HallofShame will now begin to list you as the attorney and the firm you represent. It will be a stain you cannot remove and it will be all self inflicted because you knew better!
Aid and Abet? Make no mistake, the panels today are not ignorant. The attorney is the mastermind of the hijacking as well as the driver of the car the way I see it given what we know now. You have been hired as a contract hit man so to speak but the hit is not on a person, it is on property. Your client is in the back seat directing you and paying you to help him hijack a domain name when your real job is to protect him. The moment you go along with that scheme, you are just as guilty because you know what you are doing. It is premeditated. You are just as guilty aren't you Mr. Attorney?? If not, why not? I have read the decisons and the panels have been brutal when they get lied to. When lawyers and their clients fabricate accusations and get caught doing it!
Wrong minded? Outrageous? Over the top? ok fine. I may be guilty of bad taste. How does that measure up against being found guilty of Reverse Hijacking a domain name by the govering panel? Worth the gamble of ending up here at HallofShame.com and then what? Blame me? Threaten ME!?
All I am suggesting is you better be on solid ground when you hit somebody with a WIPO or NAF action. Your choice and just remember that Your Name will be included in the fallout. It's not up to you and it is not in your control once you are found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.
Client: Armor Bank ( Forrest City, Arkansas, United States )
Result: Armor Bank found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Attorney Mark R. Holland, from the Arkansas-based law firm of Mitchell Williams Selig Gates & Woodyard, PLLC, represented the Forrest City, Arkansas-based Armor Bank in its UDRP filing to force the transfer of the domains armorbank.com and armorbank.org. A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking […]
Read More...Client: Michelios 3 and AmeXio ( Neuilli-sur-Siene, France )
Result: Michelios 3 and AmeXio found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
The French law firm Legal In Motion represented the firm Michelios 3 and its subsidiary, AmeXio, in their UDRP filing aimed at forcing the transfer of the 13-year old domain, amexio.com, from its Canadian owners. A three-member panel of the World Intellectual Property Organization handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against the […]
Read More...Client: My Healthy Home, LLC ( Readington Township, New Jersey, United States )
Result: My Healthy Home, LLC found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Attorney Michael J. Feigin, of the New Jersey-based firm of Feigin and Fridman, represented My Healthy Home, LLC in its attempt to use the UDRP process to force a transfer of the domain healthyhomeexperts.net. A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against My Healthy Home, […]
Read More...Client: Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. ( Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States )
Result: Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Hunter D. Westfahl, who is house counsel for Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. represented the company in its UDRP filing to force the transfer of the domain hobbylibby.com. A single-member panel of the National Arbitration Forum handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against Hobby Lobby on December 12, 2024.
Read More...Client: European Union Intellectual Property Office ( Alicante, Spain, European Union )
Result: European Union Intellectual Property Office found guilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
Rudolf Bicek Ph.D., of the Czechian law firm of Schönherr Rechtsanwälte GmbH, represented the European Union Intellectual Property Office in its UDRP filing to acquire the domain epta-agencies.com from its registrant and owner. A single-member panel of the Czech Arbitration Court handed up a ruling of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against the EUIPO on December […]
Read More...